Everyone answers the phone. Nobody documents the case.
Answering services, intake AIs, per-minute receptionists — the category is crowded. Here is the same feature list run across the tools firms actually shortlist against us, drawn from what each advertises on its public site.
| FEATURE | Burt | Kayse | Relevint | Answering Legal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24/7 automated intake | HUMANS | |||
| AI web chat intake | BASIC BOT | |||
| AI phone intake | COMING SOON | HUMAN ONLY | ||
| Photo / video / webcam evidence at intake Premium | — | — | — | |
| Live human takeover, one click | — | — | — | |
| Bilingual EN / ES | — | |||
| One flat monthly price, no per-lead fees | $999/MO + USAGE | % OF REVENUE | PER MINUTE |
A few of those rows are ours alone.
Evidence captured at the moment of intake, on Premium. A live handoff to your team in one click. We don’t know of an answering service or another intake AI that advertises either one. How we handle those claimant conversations underneath — isolation, audit, retention — is documented on Security & trust.
Being early pays off.
Burt is new, and we’re honest about it: no borrowed logos, no invented testimonials — just what signing on with an early team actually gets a firm.
- Start where you are: Free live chat for $0, Pro AI intake for $49/mo, or Premium for $99/mo, flat. No plan charges per lead.
- A direct line to the builders: your feedback goes to the people writing the code, not a ticket queue.
- Your cases shape the roadmap: new firms tell us what to build next, from CRM sync to follow-up automation.
Why no logo wall?
Legal-tech sites lean on borrowed credibility: logos, star ratings, unverifiable percentages. We’d rather show you the actual product: the real dashboard, the real case file, the real billing rules, on this site, in full detail.
When our first firms agree to be named, they’ll be here. Until then, we won’t invent them.